Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1977No. 56PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PACKEL, Judge.

The potential use or abuse of redaction 1 to permit the use of confessions of co-defendants in a joint criminal trial was pointed out in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). Counsel for the appellant refers to the absence in this jurisdiction of appellate authority dealing with redaction, and asks the Court to hold that redaction should not be allowed because it can never be done in such a manner as to protect a defendant. In the alternative, the request is made that we should hold that the manner in which the redaction was done in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. United States v. Roland W. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. Phillip Coltrane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Oliver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. BondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API