In the Interest of A. A.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Presiding Judge.
The juvenile court adjudicated A. A. and J. H. delinquent for curfew violation, OCGA § 15-11-2, and minor in possession of alcoholic beverage, OCGA § 3-3-23. In addition, A. A. was adjudicated delin*370quent for driving under the influence, OCGA § 40-6-391, and possession of marijuana, OCGA § 16-13-30. On appeal, the juveniles argue that the evidence was insufficient and that the court erred in denying their motion to suppress. For reasons which follow, we conclude there was no reversible error and affirm.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s findings…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- McClain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- State v. FolkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bodiford v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- In the Interest of R. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Durrance v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Hendrix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Oglesby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.