Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 3, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

827 A.2d 1087 (2003)

362 N.J. Super. 229

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Peter THOMAS a.k.a. Isaac Thomas, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted April 2, 2003.

Decided July 3, 2003.

Peter Thomas, appellant pro se.

Edward J. DeFazio, Hudson County Prosecutor, for respondent (Susan B. Gyss, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, LISA and FUENTES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LISA, J.A.D.

We consider in this appeal whether defendant, Peter Thomas, was wrongfully denied his right to represent himself in a criminal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. State v. HarrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  3. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. State v. RoseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  5. LaManna v. Proformance Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API