Legal Opinion
LaManna v. Proformance Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 5, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
837 A.2d 384 (2003)
364 N.J. Super. 473
Roseann LAMANNA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PROFORMANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 21, 2003.
Decided December 5, 2003.
Gill & Chamas, attorneys for appellant (Paul K. Caliendo, on the brief).
Methfessel & Werbel, Edison, attorneys for respondent (Martin McGowan, on the brief).
Before Judges SKILLMAN, COBURN and FISHER.
The opinion of the court was delivered by COBURN, J.A.D.
In this personal injury action, plaintiff sought benefits under the uninsured motorist provision of an automobile…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- State v. PonterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamanna v. Proformance InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- KYLIE TAPIA VS. ABU S. ALAM, MD (L-0694-15, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- Lamanna v. Proformance InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005