People v. Reifsteck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the trial court did not conduct a formal inquiry of defendant’s age, experience, education and knowledge of the hazards of pro se representation (see, People v Kaltenbach, 60 NY2d 797, 799; People v Williams, 96 AD2d 740), our review of the record reveals that defendant was 35 years old with a 20-year criminal record including a prior felony; that he had a thorough understanding of the criminal justice system and of the rights and remedies available to him; that he was articulate in advancing his legal arguments and was firm in his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. VivenzioNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. KaltenbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. MileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. BergerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
- People v. HodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. PickensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.