Legal Opinion

People v. Reifsteck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the trial court did not conduct a formal inquiry of defendant’s age, experience, education and knowledge of the hazards of pro se representation (see, People v Kaltenbach, 60 NY2d 797, 799; People v Williams, 96 AD2d 740), our review of the record reveals that defendant was 35 years old with a 20-year criminal record including a prior felony; that he had a thorough understanding of the criminal justice system and of the rights and remedies available to him; that he was articulate in advancing his legal arguments and was firm in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. VivenzioNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. KaltenbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. BergerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
  4. People v. HodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. PickensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API