People v. Pickens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
When this matter was previously before us (216 AD2d 631), we determined that in order to review defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel and speedy trial contentions, a remittal was necessary for County Court to conduct a hearing to determine whether the time accruing as a result of City Court’s adjournment of a preliminary hearing from December 3, 1990 to December 10, 1990 was chargeable to the People. With the hearing having been conducted to address this issue, we can now effectively review defendant’s contentions. Upon our review of the hearing record, we agree with County Court that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. McIntyreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People v. AliceaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.