Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Ry. Corp. v. Railroad Commission of California

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 10, 1928No. N-115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s electric car tracks occupy public streets in Los Angeles under franchises granted by the city and county of Los Angeles. Its bus lines are operated under permits granted by the county. In some of the franchises for electric lines, there are provisions that the rate of fare shall not exceed 5 cents, except under a proper showing before a competent authority having jurisdiction over rates of fare that such greater rate is justified; in others, there are clauses that the rate of fare for any distance one way shall not exceed 5 cents for one passenger. A franchise ordinance adopted in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saulsbury Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. Sinaiko Bros. Coal & Oil Co. v. Ethyl Gasoline Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API