David Jessup and Diane Jessup v. Chicago Franchise Systems, Inc. and Jag's Dough Decor d/b/a Nancy's Pizza
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of Nov 26 2013, 5:32 am establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: P. ADAM DAVIS Attorney for Chicago Franchise Systems Davis & Sarbinoff, LLP EDWARD F. HARNEY, JR. Indianapolis, Indiana Hume Smith Geddes Green & Simmons, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA DAVID JESSUP and DIANE JESSUP, ) ) Appellants-Defendants, ) ) vs. ) No.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Ethyl Corporation v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Local No. 7441, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Theodore Papapetropoulous v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Gingiss International, Inc. v. Norman E. Bormet and Phyllis M. BormetCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Reuille v. E.E. Brandenberger Construction, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.