Legal Opinion
Gingiss International, Inc. v. Norman E. Bormet and Phyllis M. Bormet
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 26, 1995No. 94-3694PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Gingiss International, Inc. (“Gingiss”) and H-K Formalwear Corporation (“H-K For-malwear”) entered into a franchise agreement on December 18,1984, under which HK Formalwear was granted the right to operate a Gingiss Formalwear Center store in Industry, California. The franchise agreement contained an arbitration clause which provided that all disputes between the parties relating to the agreement would be subject to arbitration in Chicago under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16, and the Rules of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), unless…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Emily DistajoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Subway Equipment Leasing Corp. v. ForteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Carter v. SSC Odin Operating CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.