United States v. Nabil S. Al Mudarris, and Salah S. Al Mudarris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Appellants seek to have us overturn their conviction for mail fraud against a medical insurance carrier. They contend that prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury necessitated dismissal of their indictment.
I. FACTS
Appellants Nabil and Salah A1 Mudarris are brothers. Salah had medical insurance, Nabil did not.
On Christmas Eve 1974 a man later identified as Salah, but using a false name, delivered a severely burned man to the hospital. The patient, later identified as Nabil, was admitted as Salah.
Nabil’s wife later testified that Salah told her this was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. PolizziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Ernest S. Little v. City of Seattle John Doe Jane Doe, and David PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Rivera-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Edgardo Giorgi, United States of America v. Gilberto Ocasio-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.