Legal Opinion
De'Sha v. Reed
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 19, 1977No. 27767PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle
The petitioner, Paul B. de’Sha, Foreman of the 1977 Statutory Denver County Grand Jury, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus against the District Court in and for the Second Judicial District and the Honorable Harold D. Reed, District Judge, to direct the judge to disclose the grand jury’s report. We issued a rule to show cause and now discharge the rule.
In July of 1977, the grand jury issued a report. On July 14, 1977, Dale Tooley, District Attorney in and for the Second Judicial District and legal advisor to the grand jury, filed in the respondent district court a motion for release of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Interrogatories Propounded by the Senate Concerning House Bill 1078Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Associated Students of the University of Colorado v. Regents of the University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- People v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Dixon v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- People Ex Rel. Boatright v. NewlonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
3Cited by28 opinions
- Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Colorado Common Cause v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- City of Durango v. Durango Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Zaner v. City of BrightonColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.