Weaver v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Chief Justice CORNELIUS.
Steven Weaver appeals from his conviction for felony driving while intoxicated. The jury assessed his punishment at thirty-nine years’ imprisonment. He contends that the evidence is factually and legally insufficient to support the verdict.
Weaver was charged by indictment with driving while intoxicated. The indictment alleged that Weaver had been convicted previously of two offenses, one on August 10, 1990, and one on January 17, 1984. The jury charge did not contain any language authorizing the jury to find Weaver guilty of any lesser offense, such as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
- Will v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- Renshaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Charles Clinton Summers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Gerald Tyrone Turner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
- Summers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.