Renshaw v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Justice.
Ronald Renshaw appeals from his conviction for driving while intoxicated. Upon proof that he had previously been twice convicted for DWI, the jury assessed his punishment at ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. 1
Renshaw contends on appeal that there was no or insufficient evidence to prove that he had committed two prior DWI offenses within the last ten years and that the State failed to provide him with exculpatory material. He also contends that the court erred by permitting an undisclosed witness to testify, by refusing to hold a competency hearing, by permitting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Will v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Addington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- James v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1999
- Mapes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- State v. Atwood, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Bower v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.