Commonwealth v. Grossman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STOUT, Justice.
Jack D. Grossman appeals from the Superior Court’s order affirming his conviction for . thirteen counts of theft by failure to make required disposition of funds received. 358 Pa.Super. 625, 514 A.2d 198. 18 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 3927 (Purdon 1983). Appellant contends that the courts below erroneously failed to suppress evidence seized from Appellant’s place of business. The issue presented in this *292case is whether a warrant that authorized the seizure of “[a]ll insurance files, payment records, receipt records, copies of insurance applications and policies,'…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. Jacoby, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.