Kostik v. Commonwealth

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

Claimant-appellant applied for unemployment compensation as a result of being discharged by her employer, appellee, on May 16, 1972. The Bureau of Employment Security made a determination on August 8, 1972, that no definite proof had been offered that the conduct for which claimant-appellant had been discharged could be considered wilful misconduct. On appeal, a hearing was held by the referee and evidence offered by both the claimant-appellant and employerappellee.

The referee, on December 1, 1972, concluded: “The claimant’s action was a breach of duty owed to her…