Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corp. v. Commercial Contracting Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 11, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 11458PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, United States Steel Corporation (hereinafter called Steel), a New Jersey corporation, on August 19, 1957, engaged in a contract with the defendant, Commercial Contracting Corporation (hereinafter called Commercial), a corporation of Michigan, not licensed to do business in New Jersey, for construction work on the Sheet and Tin Division of its Fairless Works at Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, for which the plaintiff agreed to pay $418,000. The contract has been completed and plaintiff concedes that it has not paid a balance of $20,900 due from it to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mueller v. Seaboard Commercial Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Barnes v. VerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Brudvik v. Frosaker Blaisdell Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Original R. & R. Pickle Works v. G. ARRIGONI & C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Seiden v. FishteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Britton v. Howard Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Behring International, Inc. v. Imperial Iranian Air ForceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1979
- First Western Financial Corporation v. NeumeyerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
- Britton v. Howard Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984