Brudvik v. Frosaker Blaisdell Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Birdzell, Ch. J.
This is an action by tbe plaintiffs, as copartners, to recover of tbe defendant tbe sum of $1,764, wbicb tbe plaintiffs allege, was received by tbe defendant from tbe General Motors Acceptance Corporation for tbe use of tbe plaintiffs. From a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiffs entered on a verdict of a jury, tbe defendant bas appealed. Tbe facts necessary to an understanding of tbe questions presented on appeal may be briefly stated as follows: Tbe defendant company, of Minot, being in tbe business of dealer and distributor of certain automobiles, entered into a contract witb…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ross v. WillettNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- In re McConnellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1912
3Cited by9 opinions
- DeBoy v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Pan American Trade & Investment Corp. v. Commercial Metals Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- SPW ASSOCIATES, LLP v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Voltz v. DudgeonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Kartalis v. Lakeland Plaza Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.