Legal Opinion

Brudvik v. Frosaker Blaisdell Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdzell, Ch. J.

This is an action by tbe plaintiffs, as copartners, to recover of tbe defendant tbe sum of $1,764, wbicb tbe plaintiffs allege, was received by tbe defendant from tbe General Motors Acceptance Corporation for tbe use of tbe plaintiffs. From a judgment in favor of tbe plaintiffs entered on a verdict of a jury, tbe defendant bas appealed. Tbe facts necessary to an understanding of tbe questions presented on appeal may be briefly stated as follows: Tbe defendant company, of Minot, being in tbe business of dealer and distributor of certain automobiles, entered into a contract witb…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ross v. WillettNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In re McConnellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DeBoy v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Pan American Trade & Investment Corp. v. Commercial Metals Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  3. SPW ASSOCIATES, LLP v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Voltz v. DudgeonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kartalis v. Lakeland Plaza Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API