Highland v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Appellant instituted this action to recover the difference between the contract price of bituminous coal and the amount paid under government regulations promulgated while this country was at war with Germany. The contract of sale was made when we were actively engaged in war, and after the announcement by the government of the prices on coal. The claim for the difference in price was based in the court below on the allegation that Congress, under.the Constitution, did not possess the power to enact the phases of the Lever Act (U. S. Comp. Stat. Ann. Supp. 1919,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.