Legal Opinion
Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 27, 2012No. Case No. 1:11-cv-02000-CJCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CONVERTED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Fresno Motors, LLC and Selma Motors, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”), alleging that MBUSA tortiously interfered with Plaintiffs’ contractual right to purchase the assets of Mercedes-Benz of Fresno, a local Mercedes-Benz dealership (“Fresno Dealership”), from Asbury Fresno Imports, LLC (“Asbury”). (Dkt. No. 1.) In the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Plaintiffs allege that it executed an Asset…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- No Cost Conference, Inc. v. Windstream Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Powerhouse Motorsports v. Yamaha Motor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013