Legal Opinion
Saenz v. Marshall
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 3, 1992No. CV 91-4849-R(JG)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REAL, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court has reviewed the petition, all of the records and files herein, and the attached Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve copies of the Order Adopting and Judgment by United States mail on the petitioner, the Attorney General of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Lamont S. Carter, United States of America v. Jerome R. Patterson, United States of America v. Jerome R. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.