Legal Opinion

Prodear, S. A. v. Robin International Cinerama Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 11, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYATT, District Judge.

The motion by plaintiff is under Fed. R.Civ.P. 30(b) to vacate a notice served .by defendants that on March 18, 1963 they would take the deposition of plaintiff by Robert Haggiag, its principal executive officer. Plaintiff also asks for authority to take the deposition of defendants by Nikolas Reisini (apparently the principal executive officer of defendants), for production of documents at such deposition, and for the deposition of Haggiag to be taken thereafter.

A motion is made by defendant, said to be under Civil Rule 4 of this Court, to direct plaintiff by Haggiag to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keller-Dorian Colorfilm Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  2. Reading-Sinram-Streat Coals, Inc. v. Metropolitan Petroleum Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis Carreau, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Nedd v. ThomasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Boxer v. Smith, Kline & French LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Occidental Chemical Corp. v. OHM Remediation ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  5. Guidehouse LLP v. ShahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API