Legal Opinion
Nedd v. Thomas
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 5, 1969No. Civ. No. 8796PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*553MEMORANDUM
NEALON, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion by plaintiffs, Charles Nedd, Dominic Iero, Max Dynoski and Anthony Ganly (hereinafter referred to as Pensioned Miners), for a Protective Order pursuant to Rules 80(b) and 31(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion seeks a stay of the taking of certain depositions of the Pensioned Miners sought by defendant United Mine Workers of America (hereinafter referred to as Union), and postponement of answers to interrogatories propounded by defendant Union until thirty days after the filing of answers to plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Producers Releasing Corp. De Cuba v. PRC Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Solomon v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Maita v. KilleenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Sunkyong International, Inc. v. Anderson Land & Livestock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Dick v. Atlantic City Medical CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Sunkyong International, Inc., Appellee, v. Anderson Land & Livestock CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987