Legal Opinion
Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. of Newport v. Whidden
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 3, 1956No. 5-1087PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
This case was tried before the Circuit Judge without a jury, and the plaintiff 1 recovered a judgment for $3,000 for injuries claimed to have been received when a bottle of carbonated beverage exploded. The Trial Court stated:
“Since the Supreme Court of Arkansas positively and unequivocally stated that the res ipsa loquitur doctrine should be applied in the State of Arkansas in the Hicks 2 case, and it is the recollection of the court it was again applied in the Mattice 3 case, and there are no recent decisions altering the Supreme Court’s declaration to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. EllenwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fort Smith v. HicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Stockton v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Alldread v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ferrell v. Sikeston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969