Legal Opinion

Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. of Newport v. Whidden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 1956No. 5-1087PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This case was tried before the Circuit Judge without a jury, and the plaintiff 1 recovered a judgment for $3,000 for injuries claimed to have been received when a bottle of carbonated beverage exploded. The Trial Court stated:

“Since the Supreme Court of Arkansas positively and unequivocally stated that the res ipsa loquitur doctrine should be applied in the State of Arkansas in the Hicks 2 case, and it is the recollection of the court it was again applied in the Mattice 3 case, and there are no recent decisions altering the Supreme Court’s declaration to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. EllenwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fort Smith v. HicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Stockton v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Alldread v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. Sikeston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API