Legal Opinion

In the Interest of S.E.K.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 28, 2009No. 05-08-00858-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MOSELEY.

The parties to this appeal are the biological parents of S.E.K. and H.A.K.1 Mother appeals the trial court’s order in a suit to modify the parent-child relationship. The modification order, among other things, removed Mother and Father as joint managing conservators of S.E.K. and H.A.K., and appointed Mother as sole managing conservator for S.E.K and Father as sole managing conservator for H.A.K. In five issues, Mother contends the trial court erred by not making a finding of fact regarding allegations of sexual abuse against Father and by not recording an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In the Interest of V.L.K.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hotel Partners v. KPMG Peat Marwick, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. In the Interest of M.P.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Buckeye Retirement Co., LLC, Ltd. v. Bank of America, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of S.N.Z.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. In the Interest of W.C.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. CITY OF McALLEN, TEXAS v. Arnaldo Ramirez Jr., Raul Romero, Promotions of America, Inc., Nolana Entertainment, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
  4. Phoneternet, LLC and Adam Alfia v. Drawbridge Design, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
  5. in Re: K. M., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API