Reis v. Miller
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceGilbertson, Justice
[¶ 27] I fully concur with the analysis and result of the majority opinion. I write separately only to present additional analysis which I believe also supports the majority conclusion. It is clear that South Dakota has a tradition of allowing hunting except where the Legislature has chosen to restrict or prohibit it.
[¶ 28] Historically, there is no support for the contention of the Plaintiffs that the Territorial Legislature in 1870, when accepting the rights-of-way easement from the Federal Government by enacting what is now SDCL 31-18-1, somehow intended to limit or preclude hunting from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bates v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State v. PetersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. PollockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Clark v. BatesSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.