Missouri Pac. R. v. Norwood
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Per curiam
In 1907, Arkansas enacted a “full crew” law (affecting freight trains) requiring three brakemen on trains of 25 or more cars (Ark. Laws 1907, Act No. 116 [page 295]) and, in 1913, a “full crew” law requiring 3 switch “helpers” in all cities of the first and second class where switching movements were made across public crossings within the city limits (Ark. Laws 1913, Act No. 67 [page 211]). The validity of these laws was promptly questioned. The contest and controversy was over the third brakeman and the third switch helper; the railways contending these third men were unnecessary. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. NorwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. NorwoodDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. v. HardinDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1965
- New York Central Railroad v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Adams, Inc. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- New York Central Railroad v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.