Legal Opinion

Tabish v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2003No. 36873Published

1Opinion of the Court

72 P.3d 584 (2003)

Richard Bennett TABISH and Sandra Renee Murphy, Appellants,

v.

The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

No. 36873.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

July 14, 2003.

William B. Terry, Las Vegas, for Appellant Tabish.

Herbert Sachs, Las Vegas; Dershowitz, Eiger & Adelson, PC, and Alan M. Dershowitz and Victoria B. Eiger, New York, New York, for Appellant Murphy.

Brian Sandoval, Attorney General, Carson City; David J. Roger, District Attorney, and James Tufteland and David T. Wall, Chief Deputy District Attorneys, Clark County, for Respondent.

Before the Court En Banc.

OPINION

ROSE, J.:

The State charged…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API