Legal Opinion

Freiberg, Klein & Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1890No. 6493PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Johnson County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Will-son, J:

§ 142. Judgment; cannot be rendered for principal of note, interest thereon and attorney's fees when the verdict is only for the principal. The Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company instituted this suit against T. J. Love-lady, Freiberg, Klein & Co., James Foster and Y. H. Merriwether. As alleged in the petition, the cause of action against the several defendants is, in substance, that on August 1, 1885, T. J. Lovelady, by his agent, J. P. Lovelady, executed and delivered to plaintiffs four promissory notes, each for the sum of $67.5,0, bearing ten per cent, interest per…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Freiberg, Kline & Co. v. MagaleTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frith v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. King v. Texacally Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Shwiff v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. United States v. Menier Hardware No. 1, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1963
  5. Billingsley v. Mossler Acceptance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API