Legal Opinion

State v. Hancock

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1976No. 75-1070PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHebbert, J.

Appellant contends initially that the submission to a jury, over the objection of the defendant, of three'specifications of aggravation under one count of aggravated murder, pursuant to R. C. 2929.04(A), where each specification 'presents a different premise of aggravating circumstances, constitutes reversible error.'

Imposition of the death penalty for aggravated murder in -this state is precluded unless “one or more” of statu-t,orily specified criteria is identified in the indictment dr Count in the indictment, pursuant to R. C. 2941.14, and .is proved beyond a'reasonable doubt. R.. C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Joseph Collon, United States of America v. John GarsideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. BreedloveOhio Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. FolkOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API