Legal Opinion

State v. Parks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 15, 1990No. 12067PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grady, Judge.

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant defendant-appellant’s motion to continue his trial. The basis of the motion was that the state had failed to meet its obligations under Crim.R. 16 by willfully failing to provide the address of the state’s complaining witness. After allowing counsel for defendant-appellant to unsuccessfully attempt to interview the witness in the hallway of the courthouse on the morning of trial, the trial court concluded that the witness’s refusal to discuss the case with counsel for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. EllisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. BatesOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API