State v. Parks
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, Judge.
In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant defendant-appellant’s motion to continue his trial. The basis of the motion was that the state had failed to meet its obligations under Crim.R. 16 by willfully failing to provide the address of the state’s complaining witness. After allowing counsel for defendant-appellant to unsuccessfully attempt to interview the witness in the hallway of the courthouse on the morning of trial, the trial court concluded that the witness’s refusal to discuss the case with counsel for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. EllisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. BatesOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.