Legal Opinion
Rose v. Firstar Bank
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided March 27, 2003No. 2001-556-M.PPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
Personal jurisdiction provides the plat du jour on this certiorari petition. A Rhode Island mother and her two children, who are the beneficiaries of an Ohio trust, have haled an Ohio trustee into the Providence County Superior Court to answer charges of mismanaging the trust. An Ohio resident, now deceased, created the trust in Ohio, pursuant to which an Ohio bank and its predecessors have served as the trustee for many years. After her mother created the trust in Ohio, the plaintiff Laura Love Rose (Rose), a beneficiary of the trust, moved to Rhode Island and became…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Phillips Exeter Academy v. Howard Phillips Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cerberus Partners, L.P. v. Gadsby & Hannah, LLPSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Cassidy v. Lonquist Management Co., LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Fellows v. ColburnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Hoag v. Hon. french/wellsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Anthony Pullar v. Louis CappelliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.