Krutz v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Miami District Court. Ejectment brought by Chandler against Krutz and two others. Trial by the court at the February Term, 1884. The court found and adjudged that— “The defendant, William G. Krutz, is the owner of the land described in the petition of the plaintiff, to wit, all that portion of the southwest quarter of section number four, in township number seventeen, south, in range number twenty-three, east, etc., lying east of Bull creek, excepting six and six…
Read the full summary
Error from Miami District Court. Ejectment brought by Chandler against Krutz and two others. Trial by the court at the February Term, 1884. The court found and adjudged that— “The defendant, William G. Krutz, is the owner of the land described in the petition of the plaintiff, to wit, all that portion of the southwest quarter of section number four, in township number seventeen, south, in range number twenty-three, east, etc., lying east of Bull creek, excepting six and six one-hundredth acres belonging to the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Bailroad Company as a right of way, containing one…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action in the nature of ejectment, brought by George B. Chandler against William G. Krutz and others, to recover all that portion of the southwest quarter of section 4, in township 17, south, of range 23, east, and lying east of Bull creek, excepting six and six one-*661hundredth acres belonging to the Missouri river, Fort Scott & Gulf railroad company as a right of way — the plaintiff’s tract containing 146^®^- acres. It is admitted that in March, 1876, and subsequently thereto, Krutz owned the land in controversy and had the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Board of Commissioners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. Van PeltNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- Barker v. TraberCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900
- Douglass v. ByersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Harding v. GreeneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898