Legal Opinion

City of Dixon v. Baker

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1872PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lee county; the Hon. William W. Heaton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

This was an action of trespass on the case, brought against the city, to recover damages for flowing surface water upon the lot of plaintiff, by the raising of the grade of the street and sidewalk.

The proof shows that, by the elevation of the grade of the street, on the part of the city, surface water flowed into the basement of the house of the plaintiff, and thereby the building was injured and the walls cracked.

The broad ground is taken that municipal corporations are not liable for damages caused by such flowage of the surface water; that the damages are incidental, and they are not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Van Meter v. Darien Park Dist.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Burford v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Lund v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API