Horsman v. Cooney
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PATRICK HORSMAN and HORSMAN HOLDINGS LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-1205-SPC-KCD MICHAEL COONEY, Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Michael Cooney’s Motion to Compel Arbitration or Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 32). Plaintiffs Patrick Horsman and Horsman Holdings LLC responded in opposition. (Doc. 40). Thus, the motion is ripe for review. This action arises out of a business divorce. But resolving Defendant’s motion requires returning to the relationship’s beginning. In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Nemec v. ShraderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Harold T. McCormick v. R. B. Kent, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Kuroda v. SPJS Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.