Legal Opinion
Micro Connections, Inc. v. Shah (In Re Shah)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 10, 2008No. 1-19-40776PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
DOROTHY EISENBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to an adversary proceeding commenced by Micro Connections, Inc. and Vishnu Dayal (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) against Rupal J. Shah (the “Debtor” or the “Defendant”) seeking to have the Debtor’s discharge denied pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(3) and (a)(4)(A). 1 Based on the facts of this case and the relevant case law, the Court finds that the Plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested on both counts. The following constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as mandated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re UnderhillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In Re Diorio, Bankrupt, Philip A. Diorio, Bankrupt v. Kreisler-Borg Construction Co., Objecting CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- In re TabibianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Carlucci & Legum v. Murray (In Re Murray)District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Dubrowsky v. Estate of Perlbinder (In Re Dubrowsky)District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pereira v. Gardner (In Re Gardner)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Moreo v. Rossi (In Re Moreo)District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Ng v. Adler (In re Adler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Ng v. AdlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Virovlyanskaya v. Virovlyanskiy (In re Virovlyanskiy)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.