Legal Opinion

In Re Sargent

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 27, 1976No. 7168PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon an agreed statement of facts, the following question of law was reserved and transferred prior to trial from Merrimack County Probate Court (Cushing, J.):

“Can the State of New Hampshire recover from a patient, pursuant to RSA Chapter 8 (as amended), board and care expenses furnished to one committed to the New Hampshire Hospital pursuant to RSA 607:3 (repealed and reenacted as RSA 651:9; see laws of 1971, 518:1)?”

Decision has been delayed to await arguments in In re Robb, No. 7414, decided this day. The question is asked in light of the following facts: John H. Sargent on April 21, 1965,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Belkner v. PrestonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Kough v. HoehlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fayle v. StapleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Fayle v. StapleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. In Re Russell C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Bank of Sturgeon Bay v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API