Legal Opinion
Pease v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 20, 2007PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.
[¶ 1] Jason Pease appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Cole, J.) granting State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s motion for a summary judgment on Pease’s complaint for uninsured motorist (UM) coverage under his State Farm personal insurance policy. Pease contends that the court erred in its determination that State Farm’s UM policy exclusion for vehicles furnished for the insured’s regular use is valid pursuant to Maine’s UM statute, 24-A M.R.S. § 2902(1) (2005).1 Because we conclude that the policy exclusion does not apply to the vehicle stolen…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. NissenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Young v. Greater Portland Transit DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Foremost Insurance Co. v. LevesqueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- American Protection Insurance v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Picher v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Tibbetts v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Peerless Indemnity Insurance C v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Penn-America Insurance v. LavigneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Vt. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ben-AmiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.