Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Blachura

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1989No. Docket 96117Published

1Dissent

W. Moore, Jr., J.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the majority’s position that Blachura was convicted of "more than one offense” as that phrase is used in MCL 780.621; MSA 28.1274(101). In my view, the Legislature’s intent would be better served with the opposite interpretation. The purpose of the expungement statute is to create a possibility for a first-time offender that, after five years without a subsequent conviction, he might show the court that he has been rehabilitated and have his record expunged. Although defendant *721here was convicted of five counts of perjury, they all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. StoudemireMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Application of FontanaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. People v. ManningMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API