Legal Opinion
Tiger v. Verdigris Valley Elec. Coop.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 2016No. 112,777PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
¶ 1 The issue in this matter is whether summary judgment was properly granted to decedent's employer pursuant to Parret v. UNICCO Service Co., 2005 OK 54, 127 P.3d 572. Because material issues of fact remain in dispute, this cause must be remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 On January 9, 2008, a field engineer for Verdigris Valley Electric Cooperative (Employer) met with a contract electrician for Integrated Service Company LLC (INSERV) in Catoosa, Oklahoma, concerning the installation of additional underground electrical…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Stuckey v. Young Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Lind v. Barnes Tag Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- LIND v. BARNES TAG AGENCYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- MARSHALL v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.