Legal Opinion
MARSHALL v. CITY OF TULSA
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 6, 2024No. 122429PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSHALL v. CITY OF TULSA
2024 OK 78
Case Number: 122429
Decided: 11/06/2024
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cite as: 2024 OK 78, __ P.3d __
NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
SARAH MARSHALL, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
CITY OF TULSA and LOREN POSS, Defendants/Appellees.
ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
HONORABLE CAROLINE WALL, TRIAL JUDGE
¶0 Tulsa Animal Welfare, a department within the City of Tulsa, placed a pit bull mix with Loren Poss. Poss went on vacation and left dog with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Wofford v. Eastern State HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Stuckey v. Young Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Delbrel v. Doenges Bros. Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michael W. Gates and Susan J. Gates v. Jim Hudson, Secretary, Department of Finance and Administration of the State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025
- Lawrence v. Clubcorp NV II, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2024
- Carter Fields, an individual; Hannah Hipps, an individual v. Hench's Country Liv'n Homes of Calera; Jessup Housing; Crown Contracting, LLC; 21st Mortgage Corporation; Austin Rupp, an individual; Stephen Stubbs, an individualDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- Phyllis Mack v. Schindler Elevator CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- Scholl v. Walgreens Specialty PharmacyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026