Legal Opinion

The Arfeld

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 2, 1930No. Nos. 17193, 17194, 17220PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BORAH, District Judge.

These actions arise out of a collision between the steamships Arfeld and Lacuna, the collision having occurred on the west side of the Mississippi river opposite Pilot Town, on February 2, 1923, at about 7:50 p. m. A libel for damages was filed by tbe owners of each of tbe vessels against tbe other vessel. The Great Western Sugar Company and tbe Gunnison Valley Sugar Company, et al., likewise filed separate libels against the Laeuna. In each libel tbe ship proceeded against is alleged to have been solely at fault. Tbe owner of tbe Arfeld also filed, in proceeding No.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The Victory & the PlymothianSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. The Ludvig HolbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Societa Anonima Navigazione Alta Italia v. Oil Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company, Inc., and J. W. Banta, D/B/A Banta Towing Company v. Union Carbide & Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Mexican Petroleum Corp. v. Doane Towboat Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
  4. Mystic Steamship Corp. v. M/S Antonio FerrazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. United Overseas Export Lines, Inc. v. Medluck Compania Maviera, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API