Legal Opinion
State v. Harm
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1972No. Cr. 426PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Judge.
The defendant Harm has appealed from a final judgment in a post-conviction proceeding in which the trial court refused to set aside a conviction for driving a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was suspended.
The conviction is being challenged in this post-conviction proceeding on the grounds that the conviction was in violation of the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of North Dakota, and that evidence exists of material facts not previously presented and heard. Section 29-32-01(1) (a) (d), N.D.C.C. (Uniform Post-Conviction Act),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Sueppel v. EadsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Helland v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Kosmatka v. Safety Responsibility Division of the North Dakota State Highway DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. TininenkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KoubaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- In Interest of EBNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Cox v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.