Commonwealth v. Hipp
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McEWEN, Judge:
We here consider whether the results of a medical purposes blood alcohol test, voluntarily provided by hospital personnel to a police officer, are admissible at trial where the defendant subsequently exercised his statutory right to refuse to submit to a blood-alcohol test. We find no statutory or constitutional impediment to the introduction of such evidence and, therefore, affirm the judgment of sentence imposed after appellant was found guilty of driving while under the influence of alcohol.
Appellant was transported by ambulance to Chester County Hospital on December 16,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DeJohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- People v. PerlosMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. RiedelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- RDT Construction Corp. v. Colón CarloSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1996
- State v. RainsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.