Pope v. Pate
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones
Appellant, a licensed attorney, appeals an order appointing him Guardian ad Litem (GAL) for respondent Pate, the defendant in a civil forfeiture action. Appellant contends the order contains insufficient factual findings to support the appointment. We agree, and reverse and remand.
At the time of the appointment, Pate was incarcerated and, although the pleadings and orders make no reference to the rule, it appears the appointment was made pursuant to Rule 17(c), SCRCP:
when a person is imprisoned in this state, and not a minor or incompetent, the court may, in its discretion appoint a guardian…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte DibbleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
- Gossett Ex Rel. Seventh Judicial Circuit v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Matter of BishopSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duckson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Duckson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003