Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Dibble
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 19, 1983PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
279 S.C. 592 (1983)
310 S.E.2d 440
Ex parte Robert W. DIBBLE, Jr., and George L. Dial, Jr., Appellants.
In re Earl T. HAMAAS, Applicant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina, Respondent, of whom Earl T. Hamaas, and State of South Carolina are Respondents.
0024
Court of Appeals of South Carolina.
December 19, 1983.
R.W. Dibble, Jr., and George L. Dial, Jr., pro se.
Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Retired Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod, Asst. Attys. Gen. William K. Moore and Larry C. Batson, Columbia, for respondents.
Michael H. Quinn, Joseph M. Arndt and Claire T. Manning, of Quinn & Smith, Columbia, for Richland…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Scott v. RoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Cunningham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Regions Bank v. Wingard Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Jones v. LeaganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- In the Matter of Attorney Robert J. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.