Philadelphia v. Mancini
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
Amil Mancini was a cement contractor in Philadelphia whose business generally entailed working for general construction contractors for which work Mancini would submit bids to the general contractors. Mancini’s business required the employment of other persons, both residents and nonresidents of Philadelphia.
The City of Philadelphia (City), by ordinance, imposes a tax on all salaries, wages and other compensation earned by residents of the City or by nonresidents whose work is done or services performed within the City. Under tlie provisions of this ordinance each…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McKee v. ParadiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Vosburgh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Philadelphia v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Rife v. GeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- In Re Allied Electric Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Philadelphia v. Penn Plastering Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Skilled Nursing Professional Services, a Division of Skilled Nursing Home Care, Inc. v. Sacred Heart Hospital of Norristown (In Re Sacred Heart Hospital of Norristown)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hanigan v. TrumbleNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Kimball v. Barr TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.