Kimball v. Barr Township
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant, Barr Township, contends that the chancellor erred in impressing a constructive trust on funds paid to it by the Barnes and Tucker Coal Company. We affirm the decree of the lower court.
In 1971, residents of Barr and Blacklick Townships, Cambria County, began suffering a reduction in their water supply due to the mining operations of the Barnes and Tucker Coal Co. Residents of the townships, township supervisors and officials of the Coal Company met to discuss and resolve the water supply problem. The Coal Company agreed to help appellant defray the cost of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Stauffer v. StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Chambers v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Yohe v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Ralph J. Paolino v. Channel Home Centers and Air Control Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Zvonik v. ZvonikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Vento v. VentoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- In Re Kulzer Roofing, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.