Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Whiteside

United States Circuit Court

Decided October 1, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to Modify an Injunction granted in favor of complainant Sharp in the state court, and to grant an injunction in favor of "Whiteside, under her cross and supplemental bill.

1Opinion of the CourtKey, J.

A short time since it was held that this cause had been removed to the circuit court of the United States, and the parties were allowed to perfect their pleadings. The in junctions in the cause have hitherto been granted in the state court, and a motion to modify or dissolve the injunction granted complainant Sharp under the original bill made by respondent Whiteside in the state court, has been denied by that court. It is insisted that this court has no power or right to review, change, or modify the action of the state court as to-this injunction; that the question is res judicata. If the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Meguire v. CorwineSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. State v. Hartford & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Putnam v. CoatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API