Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Calvert Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 8, 1959No. 17552PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This is an action on a policy issued by the Calvert Fire Insurance Company indemnifying plaintiff, Eugene T. Campbell, against loss or damage to his automobile by collision or upset.

The fact that there was a collision is admitted. Plaintiff alleged that his automobile “was destroyed” and sought judgment for $1,350.00, which he alleged was its value. The Company denied that the automobile was damaged to this extent; alleged that plaintiff, in violation of the terms of the policy, had the automobile repaired before reporting the loss, thereby denying it a reasonable opportunity…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Potomac Ins. Co. v. WilkinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Dunmire Motor Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. American Standard County Mut. Ins. Co. v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Rossier v. Union Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lusk v. American Central InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Siegle v. Progressive Consumers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Schulmeyer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Carlton v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  5. Venable v. Import Volkswagen, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API