Legal Opinion

Adams v. Cottage Care

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 12, 2022No. 4:19-cv-00588Unknown

1Opinion

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION KARTIKA ADAMS PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:19-cv-00588-KGB COTTAGE CARE DEFENDANT OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is defendant Cottage Care’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 20). Plaintiff Kartika Adams did not respond to Cottage Care’s motion, and the time for filing a response has passed. For the following reasons, the Court grants Cottage Care’s motion for summary judgment (Id). I. Statement Of Facts Unless otherwise stated, the facts below are drawn from the Cottage Care’s statement of undisputed facts…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API